Saturday, June 30, 2012

Palestinians: UN heritage nod is political victory

BETHLEHEM, West Bank (AP) ? The Palestinians on Friday persuaded the U.N. cultural agency to list the Church of the Nativity ? the place where Christians believe Jesus was born ? as an endangered World Heritage site despite misgivings by churches in charge of the basilica.

The Palestinians hailed the nod by UNESCO as a step forward in their quest for global recognition of an independent Palestine in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, captured by Israel in 1967.

The centuries-old basilica is located in a part of the Israeli-occupied West Bank where the Palestinians have self-rule. UNESCO's decision was seen by them as validation of their rights to the territory.

"We are ecstatic," Palestinian spokeswoman Hanan Ashrawi said of Friday's 13-6 by UNESCO's World Heritage Committee, meeting in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The Palestinians had argued that the shrine faces imminent danger, both because of overdue repairs and Israel's continued occupation of the West Bank.

Israel and the U.S. strongly opposed the emergency bid, arguing that the church is not under threat, a position backed by a U.N. experts committee.

Israeli officials have said they don't object to the church being listed, but reject the "endangered" label which implies culpability of Israel, which in practice remains the ultimate sovereign in the West Bank.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Palestinians are "engaging in unilateral actions that only distance peace" and that UNESCO is driven by political considerations.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said the Palestinians now plan to submit more sites in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem. The new bids could stir more political tensions, particularly in east Jerusalem, which Israel annexed to its capital after the 1967 war.

Ashrawi said Friday's vote is the beginning of a process.

"Our identity, our place in civilization, in history, are being recognized, are beginning to be safeguarded in the face of the Israeli occupation's encroachment, the confiscation of our land, our culture," she said.

The U.S. ambassador to UNESCO, David Killion, said Washington was "profoundly disappointed" by the vote. The U.S. has been trying to block the Palestinian recognition campaign, and withdrew tens of millions of dollars in funding from UNESCO after the Paris-based agency accepted the Palestinians as a state member last year.

Joining UNESCO was part of a wider Palestinian attempt to win global recognition for a state of Palestine in the territories Israel occupied in 1967.

Israelis and Palestinians were to have negotiated the borders of a Palestinian state, but two decades of intermittent talks produced no results. The last round broke off in 2008, and the Israeli and Palestinian leaders have failed to agree on rules for renewing them.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who heads a self-rule government in charge of 38 percent of the West Bank, says negotiations with Israel remain his preferred choice, but wants global recognition to improve his leverage. An attempt to win full U.N. membership has stalled, but meanwhile Palestinians are pushing for membership in U.N. agencies.

In their first move at UNESCO, they submitted the Nativity Church and a nearby pilgrimage route as endangered heritage sites, asking to fast-track the nomination rather than go through the normal 18-month procedure.

They argued that the church is in urgent need of repairs, particularly a leaky wooden roof. Palestinian officials said foreign donors promised $20 million for the work, but so far have paid only $3 million, not enough to get started.

Palestinians argued that Israel's continued control over the area also threatens the site.

A decade ago, when Israel launched a major offensive against Palestinian militants, the church was caught in the crossfire: Palestinian gunmen holed up inside for more than a month, with Israeli tanks and troops surrounding the shrine.

Referring to the violent standoff in Friday's statement, Netanyahu put the blame on the Palestinians.

"The world needs to remember that the Church of the Nativity that is so sacred to Christianity was desecrated in the past by Palestinian terrorists," he said.

Today, Bethlehem is ringed on three sides by walls of cement slabs and fences of Israel's separation barrier ? to Israel a defense against Palestinians militants, and to Palestinians a blatant land grab disguised as a security measure.

A U.N. experts committee recommended that the Palestinians go through the normal procedure, instead of seeking the "endangered" label, but the Palestinians refused to withdraw the bid.

The churches in charge of the shrine ? Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox and Armenian ? also expressed concern, apparently fearing a World Heritage designation would lead to interference by the Palestinian government and the U.N.

The church is run according to a 19th century codex, known as the Status Quo which assigns responsibilities for upkeep that are jealously guarded by each denomination.

Palestinian officials say they've addressed the concerns by the churches.

In Bethlehem's Manger Square, next to the shrine, reaction was relatively muted Friday.

A celebration organized by local officials only brought several dozen people to the square, including youngsters in yellow T-shirts with the inscription "I love Jesus."

Palestinian Tourism Minister Rula Ma'ayah said she hopes the new heritage listing will bring more visitors. Currently, some 100,000 tourists come to Bethlehem every month.

Shop and hotel owners routinely complain they lose business because Israeli-run tour buses stop in Bethlehem just long enough for a visit to the church and then take pilgrims back to Jerusalem, a few kilometers (miles) to the north. During a recent visit, most shops on Star Street, part of the pilgrimage route, were closed.

Nabil Ziacaman, a souvenir shop owner, said Friday's vote is a step toward recognizing a state of Palestine, but won't help his business. "Everyone in the world knows the Church of the Nativity and where it is located," he said. The new label "won't bring more tourism."

Christina Yacoub, 20, from Lakeland, Florida, was more enthusiastic. Emerging from the church, said she expected more pilgrims now. The vote "shows how important this country is."

___

Laub reported from Jericho, West Bank. Associated Press writer Aron Heller in Jerusalem and Elaine Ganley in Paris contributed reporting.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/palestinians-un-heritage-nod-political-victory-192304183--finance.html

obama slow jams the news metta world peace ron artest gladys knight private practice deion sanders dancing with the stars

Science Outreach: Start Getting Artsy

The cover to Scientific American December 1916 is rocking with alluring imagery.

There?s a reason the front cover of Scientific American isn?t a wall of text.

There?s a reason it isn?t a text-heavy infographic. Images are alluring. They catch attention. They intrigue people enough to ask, ?what?s that all about??

There have been a number of discussions again lately about science communication, specifically outreach. ?Scicurious wrote a nice round-up on Neurotic Physiology, Jason Goldman at The Thoughtful Animal effectively reached some people about the recent transit of Venus across the sun and here on Symbiartic, my co-blogger wrote Communicating Science: What?s Your Problem? and A Conference of Science Communicators. If you are interested in getting the public more interested in science, attracting attention to the science blogosphere, or to picking up easy to find print publications, you need to have interesting and smart imagery.

There are two types of image which can help science posts online.

Images for clarity

At it?s simplest, this can manifest itself as ?Ok, I wrote a post about blood pressure in giraffes; I?ll include some Creative Commons or public domain photos of giraffes.? ?Not necessarily inspiring, but it gets the job done. You?ve got a visual, a bit of a hook. You might go further, and find or commission a scientific illustration showing ?the size and position of the giraffe heart and circulatory system. Scientific and medical illustration have an advantage over photos this way, since the artist edits out the extraneous viscera and bloody mess, showing the clear system cut away in a galloping or grazing giraffe.

Images for inspiration and impact

This is where science outreach needs to get artsy.

An effective artistic piece about the subject can do a whole lot more to draw people in. On a site about the safety of vaccines, instead of cold, clinical needles, why not happy, smiling children? (Making a human connection is a bonus.)

If you don?t know where to look for a science communicator with an artistic portfolio, you can start with the Science Artists Feed, a blog rss feed with over 150 wildly varying working talents. Or the Guild of Natural Science Illustrators.

Two of the scientific fields that maintain public interest in the news are astronomy and prehistoric life, usually dinosaurs. I don?t think the amount of science fiction ? in books, movies, cartoons and illustrations- that?s been built up around those disciplines?is unrelated to their popularity. ?We don?t know much about the colour and only some things about the?behaviors?of dinosaurs: but the licence by paleo-artists let?s us imagine them based on current animal analogues. We don?t know what it?s like to view sunset on an extrasolar planet; but we can see it in the illustrations generated to get us excited about it.

So it?s a challenge for illustrators and communicators alike: how do you inject emotion and artistic licence into important research with little artistic vocabulary?

The same way it?s possible to collect and enjoy a history of dinosaur art, imagine in a hundred years? time what the art history of wind power, or the Higgs-Boson or immunoproteomics will look like.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=59ca7ac8bb13974ca604b8b728455cc8

demi moore roy oswalt kevin martin 2012 senior bowl chuck series finale welcome back kotter 2001 a space odyssey

Friday, June 29, 2012

Tuxedo / Wedding Dress Rentals ?

Printer-friendly versionI'm going to be getting married soon and have been looking at Tuxedo/wedding dress places but they all seem to only offer package deals (clothes rental, makeup and wedding photo/video) Problem is they want nearly 5 million for it.. Does that seem a little high? Can anyone recommend any good places for this stuff or let me know if their experiences were similar?

Source: http://koreabridge.net/discussion/tuxedo-wedding-dress-rentals

hunger games movie review bats hunger games review jeff saturday jason smith jon corzine austin rivers